<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 36 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1373</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the rejection of the cash refund claim for Cenvat credit on exported goods. It emphasized that procedural lapses should not hinder legitimate refund claims when export and credit usage are established, highlighting the importance of adhering to substantive requirements over procedural technicalities in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 36 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1373</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the rejection of the cash refund claim for Cenvat credit on exported goods. It emphasized that procedural lapses should not hinder legitimate refund claims when export and credit usage are established, highlighting the importance of adhering to substantive requirements over procedural technicalities in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>