https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175814 A subsequent purchaser after publication of a Section 4 notification acquires no better title than the vendor and has no locus to challenge the acquisition; at most, such a purchaser may seek compensation. Quashing of Section 6 proceedings in other litigation, or later non-use of the land, does not by itself lapse a valid acquisition or create a right to reconveyance once possession has been taken and the land has vested in the State under Sections 16 and 17(2). Equitable relief was also refused because the claim rested on inconsistent pleas and misleading documents. en-us Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Dec 2015 14:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175814 A subsequent purchaser after publication of a Section 4 notification acquires no better title than the vendor and has no locus to challenge the acquisition; at most, such a purchaser may seek compensation. Quashing of Section 6 proceedings in other litigation, or later non-use of the land, does not by itself lapse a valid acquisition or create a right to reconveyance once possession has been taken and the land has vested in the State under Sections 16 and 17(2). Equitable relief was also refused because the claim rested on inconsistent pleas and misleading documents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175814