https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175813 An Assistant Commissioner in charge of a Sub-Division was held to fall within the statutory definition of "Deputy Commissioner" under section 3(c) of the Mysore Land Acquisition Act. Because the provision expressly included such an officer, no separate notification or special authorisation was required for the Assistant Commissioner to exercise the functions of a Deputy Commissioner in acquisition proceedings. The High Court had wrongly read an additional requirement into the text, so its quashing of the proceedings was unsustainable. The acquisition proceedings were restored and the appeals succeeded. en-us Tue, 25 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Dec 2015 15:08:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175813 An Assistant Commissioner in charge of a Sub-Division was held to fall within the statutory definition of "Deputy Commissioner" under section 3(c) of the Mysore Land Acquisition Act. Because the provision expressly included such an officer, no separate notification or special authorisation was required for the Assistant Commissioner to exercise the functions of a Deputy Commissioner in acquisition proceedings. The High Court had wrongly read an additional requirement into the text, so its quashing of the proceedings was unsustainable. The acquisition proceedings were restored and the appeals succeeded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175813