https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175809 The Supreme Court addressed applications seeking review/clarification/modification of its judgment related to Civil Appeals concerning the VRS scheme. It clarified the importance of directions issued in the judgment, emphasizing that an employee's request for voluntary retirement is effective only upon written acceptance by the competent authority. The Court allowed reinstatement of employees not accepting benefits under the scheme, mandating refund of amounts deposited with interest. Appeals by the State Bank of Patiala were aligned with directions for the State Bank of India. The Court dismissed applications where benefits were accepted or utilized under the VRS scheme. en-us Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175809 The Supreme Court addressed applications seeking review/clarification/modification of its judgment related to Civil Appeals concerning the VRS scheme. It clarified the importance of directions issued in the judgment, emphasizing that an employee's request for voluntary retirement is effective only upon written acceptance by the competent authority. The Court allowed reinstatement of employees not accepting benefits under the scheme, mandating refund of amounts deposited with interest. Appeals by the State Bank of Patiala were aligned with directions for the State Bank of India. The Court dismissed applications where benefits were accepted or utilized under the VRS scheme. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175809