https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175796 The judgment examines whether Section 18-G of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, read with Entry 33 of List III, had been interpreted in a way that could unduly narrow State legislative power over declared industries. It notes that the earlier approach in Synthetics and Chemicals, as followed in later cases, may render Entry 33(a) nugatory unless reconsidered, particularly in light of authorities distinguishing the seven-Judge Bench view. The Court therefore directed that the matter be placed before the Chief Justice of India for consideration of reference to a larger Bench on the formulated questions. en-us Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175796 The judgment examines whether Section 18-G of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, read with Entry 33 of List III, had been interpreted in a way that could unduly narrow State legislative power over declared industries. It notes that the earlier approach in Synthetics and Chemicals, as followed in later cases, may render Entry 33(a) nugatory unless reconsidered, particularly in light of authorities distinguishing the seven-Judge Bench view. The Court therefore directed that the matter be placed before the Chief Justice of India for consideration of reference to a larger Bench on the formulated questions. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175796