<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Uniform Arm&#039;s Length Price Application: Same Margin Required for All Transactions, Including 4% Previously Excluded.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26258</link>
    <description>Re-computation of the arm’s length price - whatever margin has been determined for the 96% of the transactions, same margin should be determined for the remaining 4% transactions as well. It is worth noting that, even before us, no distinction in facts or nature of transactions has been brought out on record - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 11:44:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 11:44:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Uniform Arm&#039;s Length Price Application: Same Margin Required for All Transactions, Including 4% Previously Excluded.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26258</link>
      <description>Re-computation of the arm’s length price - whatever margin has been determined for the 96% of the transactions, same margin should be determined for the remaining 4% transactions as well. It is worth noting that, even before us, no distinction in facts or nature of transactions has been brought out on record - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 11:44:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>