<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 294 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268990</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The bad debts write-off was allowed under section 36(1)(vii) read with section 36(2). The disallowance of commission paid was reversed due to lack of relationship between parties and proper services rendered. The applicability of section 40(a)(ia) for TDS on manufactured goods supply was negated, treating it as a contract for sale, in line with judicial precedents and consistency principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 294 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268990</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The bad debts write-off was allowed under section 36(1)(vii) read with section 36(2). The disallowance of commission paid was reversed due to lack of relationship between parties and proper services rendered. The applicability of section 40(a)(ia) for TDS on manufactured goods supply was negated, treating it as a contract for sale, in line with judicial precedents and consistency principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>