https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268966 The extension of stay application was dismissed as the appeal itself was being disposed of, rendering the need for extension unnecessary. The appellant's credit for service tax paid to the landlord was initially denied due to the landlord obtaining registration after the tax payment. However, as the appellant paid the tax after the landlord issued debit notes, the denial of credit was unjustified. Additionally, credit was denied for missing registration numbers on invoices, but since there were no allegations of non-payment and the Revenue did not verify tax deposits by the service provider, the denial was deemed unjustified. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, granting the appellant credit for the service tax amounts. en-us Fri, 02 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268966 The extension of stay application was dismissed as the appeal itself was being disposed of, rendering the need for extension unnecessary. The appellant's credit for service tax paid to the landlord was initially denied due to the landlord obtaining registration after the tax payment. However, as the appellant paid the tax after the landlord issued debit notes, the denial of credit was unjustified. Additionally, credit was denied for missing registration numbers on invoices, but since there were no allegations of non-payment and the Revenue did not verify tax deposits by the service provider, the denial was deemed unjustified. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, granting the appellant credit for the service tax amounts. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 02 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268966