<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 266 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268962</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and it was held that the Cenvat credit was rightfully availed by the appellant. The court found that the appellant was not aware of the non-payment of tax by the service provider when claiming the credit, and there was no evidence to suggest otherwise. Therefore, the Cenvat credit was deemed admissible to the appellant under the circumstances, and the decision favored the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 11:04:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 266 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268962</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and it was held that the Cenvat credit was rightfully availed by the appellant. The court found that the appellant was not aware of the non-payment of tax by the service provider when claiming the credit, and there was no evidence to suggest otherwise. Therefore, the Cenvat credit was deemed admissible to the appellant under the circumstances, and the decision favored the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>