<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 262 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268958</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellant was not eligible for Cenvat credit on Service Tax paid under challans for GTA services, as the freight was paid by another party. The appeal by the appellant was dismissed, while the Revenue&#039;s appeal was upheld. The case highlighted the significance of adhering to the Cenvat Credit Rules in attributing payments correctly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 11:04:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 262 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268958</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellant was not eligible for Cenvat credit on Service Tax paid under challans for GTA services, as the freight was paid by another party. The appeal by the appellant was dismissed, while the Revenue&#039;s appeal was upheld. The case highlighted the significance of adhering to the Cenvat Credit Rules in attributing payments correctly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>