<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 261 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268957</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving a Service Tax demand on renting of immovable property service. The appellant&#039;s compliance with Section 80(2) by paying the tax and interest within the stipulated timeframe after the Finance Bill, 2012 received the President&#039;s assent led to the Tribunal allowing the appeal. The Tribunal held that Section 80(2) applied to the appellant, emphasizing that the legislation did not differentiate between assessees who collected but did not pay the tax and those who did not collect at all. The appellant&#039;s timely payment resulted in the Tribunal ruling in their favor, with no other issues to consider.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 11:04:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 261 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268957</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving a Service Tax demand on renting of immovable property service. The appellant&#039;s compliance with Section 80(2) by paying the tax and interest within the stipulated timeframe after the Finance Bill, 2012 received the President&#039;s assent led to the Tribunal allowing the appeal. The Tribunal held that Section 80(2) applied to the appellant, emphasizing that the legislation did not differentiate between assessees who collected but did not pay the tax and those who did not collect at all. The appellant&#039;s timely payment resulted in the Tribunal ruling in their favor, with no other issues to consider.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>