<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 257 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268953</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the previous orders and directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the stay application afresh after providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. The court found a violation of natural justice in the ex parte orders and ordered the revival of the appeal and stay application against the original order. The petitioner was instructed to appear before the Commissioner (Appeals) for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 257 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268953</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the previous orders and directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the stay application afresh after providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. The court found a violation of natural justice in the ex parte orders and ordered the revival of the appeal and stay application against the original order. The petitioner was instructed to appear before the Commissioner (Appeals) for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>