<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 44 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1359</link>
    <description>A reassessment request for Bills of Entry was treated as maintainable where the imported machines were found to be computer-controlled HTHP yarn dyeing machines covered by the nil CVD exemption. The assessment had been made by a customs officer subordinate to the Assistant Commissioner without endorsement by the Assistant Commissioner, and the Board circular treated such a subordinate assessment as not finally appealable. In that setting, the plea that the assessment had become final could not defeat examination of the importer&#039;s claim. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration by the assessing authority on merits, including deletion of the EPCG-related endorsement in light of the exemption benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 44 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1359</link>
      <description>A reassessment request for Bills of Entry was treated as maintainable where the imported machines were found to be computer-controlled HTHP yarn dyeing machines covered by the nil CVD exemption. The assessment had been made by a customs officer subordinate to the Assistant Commissioner without endorsement by the Assistant Commissioner, and the Board circular treated such a subordinate assessment as not finally appealable. In that setting, the plea that the assessment had become final could not defeat examination of the importer&#039;s claim. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration by the assessing authority on merits, including deletion of the EPCG-related endorsement in light of the exemption benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>