<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 243 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268939</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging Notification No.116/2009-Cus and Final Findings on imports of Medium Density Fibreboard (MDF). The appellant&#039;s contentions regarding non-compliance with customs rules, eligibility of a company as part of the Domestic Industry, comparability of products, appropriateness of import data, procedural violations, duty imposition, examination of injury factors, undumped imports, and Non-Injurious Price determination were rejected. The Tribunal upheld the Designated Authority&#039;s decisions, finding no basis for the appellant&#039;s claims. The appeal was dismissed, and related applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 243 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268939</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging Notification No.116/2009-Cus and Final Findings on imports of Medium Density Fibreboard (MDF). The appellant&#039;s contentions regarding non-compliance with customs rules, eligibility of a company as part of the Domestic Industry, comparability of products, appropriateness of import data, procedural violations, duty imposition, examination of injury factors, undumped imports, and Non-Injurious Price determination were rejected. The Tribunal upheld the Designated Authority&#039;s decisions, finding no basis for the appellant&#039;s claims. The appeal was dismissed, and related applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>