https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175789 Service of an order by affixation was invalid where the statutory scheme required first attempting tender or registered post and permitted affixation only on failure of those primary modes. Because no such prior attempt was made, the affixation did not amount to valid service under the Act. As valid service had not been effected, the limitation period for filing the appeals could not be treated as having commenced, and the appeals could not be dismissed as time-barred. en-us Fri, 25 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Dec 2015 10:23:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175789 Service of an order by affixation was invalid where the statutory scheme required first attempting tender or registered post and permitted affixation only on failure of those primary modes. Because no such prior attempt was made, the affixation did not amount to valid service under the Act. As valid service had not been effected, the limitation period for filing the appeals could not be treated as having commenced, and the appeals could not be dismissed as time-barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175789