<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 225 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268921</link>
    <description>Input tax credit under the Haryana VAT framework cannot be denied solely because a tax invoice omits the buyer&#039;s name or TIN number where the omission is a seller-side procedural defect. The relevant inquiry is whether the buyer can otherwise show that the transactions were genuine and VAT was paid. On that basis, missing buyer details in the invoice do not by themselves defeat the credit claim. The matter was therefore required to be remitted to the assessing authority for fresh consideration rather than rejected on that ground alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 225 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268921</link>
      <description>Input tax credit under the Haryana VAT framework cannot be denied solely because a tax invoice omits the buyer&#039;s name or TIN number where the omission is a seller-side procedural defect. The relevant inquiry is whether the buyer can otherwise show that the transactions were genuine and VAT was paid. On that basis, missing buyer details in the invoice do not by themselves defeat the credit claim. The matter was therefore required to be remitted to the assessing authority for fresh consideration rather than rejected on that ground alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>