<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 303 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175783</link>
    <description>Penalty for failure to carry Form 31 at a U. P. sales tax check post was held unsustainable where the goods were duly reflected in excise records and no intention to evade tax or cause loss to revenue was found. The court treated the breach as merely technical and ruled that, without mens rea or revenue loss, the form requirement alone could not justify penalty under the Act. The penalty order was therefore set aside and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 18:11:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 303 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175783</link>
      <description>Penalty for failure to carry Form 31 at a U. P. sales tax check post was held unsustainable where the goods were duly reflected in excise records and no intention to evade tax or cause loss to revenue was found. The court treated the breach as merely technical and ruled that, without mens rea or revenue loss, the form requirement alone could not justify penalty under the Act. The penalty order was therefore set aside and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>