https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1353 The Tribunal found that the appellants were denied natural justice as they were not allowed to cross-examine all relevant witnesses during the initial proceedings. Despite a remand order, only 2 out of 8 witnesses were cross-examined in subsequent proceedings. The appellants challenged differential duty, fines, and penalties imposed, arguing against allegations of scrap diversion. The Department alleged imported scrap diversion, leading to duty demands. The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication to address the denial of natural justice and reconsider all issues, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive review. en-us Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1353 The Tribunal found that the appellants were denied natural justice as they were not allowed to cross-examine all relevant witnesses during the initial proceedings. Despite a remand order, only 2 out of 8 witnesses were cross-examined in subsequent proceedings. The appellants challenged differential duty, fines, and penalties imposed, arguing against allegations of scrap diversion. The Department alleged imported scrap diversion, leading to duty demands. The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication to address the denial of natural justice and reconsider all issues, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive review. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1353