https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175773 The bar on a second revision under Section 397(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not oust the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 or its supervisory power under Section 483. Those residual powers may still be used sparingly to prevent miscarriage of justice, abuse of process, grave illegality, irregularity, or failure of justice. The Court held that the High Court was not wholly powerless after Sessions Judge revision and that intervention was justified on the facts to correct an order causing miscarriage of justice. The impugned setting aside of the discharge was therefore upheld. en-us Fri, 24 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Aug 2016 12:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175773 The bar on a second revision under Section 397(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not oust the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 or its supervisory power under Section 483. Those residual powers may still be used sparingly to prevent miscarriage of justice, abuse of process, grave illegality, irregularity, or failure of justice. The Court held that the High Court was not wholly powerless after Sessions Judge revision and that intervention was justified on the facts to correct an order causing miscarriage of justice. The impugned setting aside of the discharge was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175773