https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175772 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Commission's order, and dismissed the complaint. The Court held that the bank had not committed any deficiency in service as it had fulfilled its obligations. The claim was deemed time-barred due to the significant delay in filing. Additionally, the respondent's locus standi to file the complaint was unclear, as it was filed by an individual while the transactions involved a partnership firm. No costs were awarded in this case. en-us Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:35:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175772 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Commission's order, and dismissed the complaint. The Court held that the bank had not committed any deficiency in service as it had fulfilled its obligations. The claim was deemed time-barred due to the significant delay in filing. Additionally, the respondent's locus standi to file the complaint was unclear, as it was filed by an individual while the transactions involved a partnership firm. No costs were awarded in this case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175772