https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268917 The tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the order denying input service credit to the appellants. It held that the denial of Cenvat Credit on capital goods due to an incorrect mention of a sister unit in the Bill of Entry was unjustified. Additionally, various services were deemed to qualify as input services for manufacturing business purposes. The tribunal granted Cenvat Credit on these services and upheld the appellant's claim of selling goods on FOR basis, entitling them to credit on outward transportation services. The duty demands and penalties were deemed unsustainable, providing relief to the appellant. en-us Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 May 2016 17:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268917 The tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the order denying input service credit to the appellants. It held that the denial of Cenvat Credit on capital goods due to an incorrect mention of a sister unit in the Bill of Entry was unjustified. Additionally, various services were deemed to qualify as input services for manufacturing business purposes. The tribunal granted Cenvat Credit on these services and upheld the appellant's claim of selling goods on FOR basis, entitling them to credit on outward transportation services. The duty demands and penalties were deemed unsustainable, providing relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268917