<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 46 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1348</link>
    <description>Semi-finished goods cleared to another unit for further manufacture must be valued in the condition in which they are removed from the factory, not as fully finished goods. The valuation method applicable to depot sales or post-clearance sales cannot be applied where the goods have not attained finished status at the time of transfer. The tribunal followed its earlier view on the same issue and held that treating an incomplete product as a finished product for valuation was incorrect. The demand raised on that basis was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 46 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1348</link>
      <description>Semi-finished goods cleared to another unit for further manufacture must be valued in the condition in which they are removed from the factory, not as fully finished goods. The valuation method applicable to depot sales or post-clearance sales cannot be applied where the goods have not attained finished status at the time of transfer. The tribunal followed its earlier view on the same issue and held that treating an incomplete product as a finished product for valuation was incorrect. The demand raised on that basis was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>