https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175761 The term "interlocutory order" under section 397(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not confined to the mere opposite of a final order; orders that affect important rights or would terminate the proceeding if sustained are not necessarily barred from revision. The revisional bar therefore does not extend to every non-final order, including orders raising jurisdictional objections. The High Court's inherent power under section 482 also survives the revisional restriction and may be used to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice in appropriate cases, though not as a routine substitute for revision. en-us Mon, 31 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Dec 2015 15:27:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175761 The term "interlocutory order" under section 397(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not confined to the mere opposite of a final order; orders that affect important rights or would terminate the proceeding if sustained are not necessarily barred from revision. The revisional bar therefore does not extend to every non-final order, including orders raising jurisdictional objections. The High Court's inherent power under section 482 also survives the revisional restriction and may be used to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice in appropriate cases, though not as a routine substitute for revision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175761