<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 200 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268896</link>
    <description>Where a house property is jointly purchased by four co-owners and the sale deed does not specify separate shares, the presumption under section 45 of the Transfer of Property Act is that the co-owners hold equal interests. The housing-loan interest deduction under section 24(b) must therefore be apportioned equally among them, and in the absence of evidence that one co-owner alone funded the acquisition or construction, a claim to the entire interest deduction is not supportable. The concurrent factual findings supporting this apportionment were not shown to be perverse or based on misreading of evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 15:18:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 200 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268896</link>
      <description>Where a house property is jointly purchased by four co-owners and the sale deed does not specify separate shares, the presumption under section 45 of the Transfer of Property Act is that the co-owners hold equal interests. The housing-loan interest deduction under section 24(b) must therefore be apportioned equally among them, and in the absence of evidence that one co-owner alone funded the acquisition or construction, a claim to the entire interest deduction is not supportable. The concurrent factual findings supporting this apportionment were not shown to be perverse or based on misreading of evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>