<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 188 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268884</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT DELHI on November 6, 2015. The assessment order u/s 144 was quashed in favor of the assessee due to the unserved notice u/s 142(1) for assessment. The treatment of cash deposits in the bank as undisclosed income was directed for proper examination by the Ld. CIT(A), who admitted additional evidence under Rule 46A. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 15:18:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 188 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268884</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT DELHI on November 6, 2015. The assessment order u/s 144 was quashed in favor of the assessee due to the unserved notice u/s 142(1) for assessment. The treatment of cash deposits in the bank as undisclosed income was directed for proper examination by the Ld. CIT(A), who admitted additional evidence under Rule 46A. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>