<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 647 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175756</link>
    <description>The HC upheld ITAT&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal concerning two issues. First, ITAT&#039;s relief on undisclosed jewellery was justified based on the assessee&#039;s plausible explanation and family status, beyond the CBDT circular. Second, the deletion of additions related to unexplained loose papers was affirmed, as ITAT&#039;s findings were evidence-based, not raising substantial legal questions. The appeal was dismissed with no costs ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 647 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175756</link>
      <description>The HC upheld ITAT&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal concerning two issues. First, ITAT&#039;s relief on undisclosed jewellery was justified based on the assessee&#039;s plausible explanation and family status, beyond the CBDT circular. Second, the deletion of additions related to unexplained loose papers was affirmed, as ITAT&#039;s findings were evidence-based, not raising substantial legal questions. The appeal was dismissed with no costs ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>