<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1582 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175739</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision regarding the addition of income from an undisclosed source under section 68 of the Act for the assessment year 2007-08. It was held that no double taxation should occur for income already taxed at the firm level and applied by the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1582 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175739</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision regarding the addition of income from an undisclosed source under section 68 of the Act for the assessment year 2007-08. It was held that no double taxation should occur for income already taxed at the firm level and applied by the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>