<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 745 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175732</link>
    <description>Order 41 Rules 22 and 33 CPC allow a respondent to challenge adverse findings without filing a cross-objection or separate appeal when doing so supports the decree. An agreement to sell is not displaced by admitted receipt extensions or later communications that do not create a new contract, so specific performance remains available where the bargain is identifiable on its original terms. Readiness and willingness under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act must be pleaded and proved, and documentary payments, timely notice, and financial capacity may establish it. Sections 79B and 80 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act do not by themselves bar specific performance, because civil courts need not decide the validity of a proposed transfer before completion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:36:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 745 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175732</link>
      <description>Order 41 Rules 22 and 33 CPC allow a respondent to challenge adverse findings without filing a cross-objection or separate appeal when doing so supports the decree. An agreement to sell is not displaced by admitted receipt extensions or later communications that do not create a new contract, so specific performance remains available where the bargain is identifiable on its original terms. Readiness and willingness under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act must be pleaded and proved, and documentary payments, timely notice, and financial capacity may establish it. Sections 79B and 80 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act do not by themselves bar specific performance, because civil courts need not decide the validity of a proposed transfer before completion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>