https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175725 A later permission-based regulatory regime did not retrospectively cancel GAMS degrees lawfully conferred under an earlier recognised framework. The State Faculty's authority under the 1951 Act, together with continued recognition in the Second Schedule to the 1970 Act, meant the GAMS qualification remained valid despite the introduction of the BAMS course and Bihar's indigenous medical regulations. The 1982 Act regulated institutions but did not annul existing degrees. The 2003 amendment introducing prior permission requirements for medical colleges was construed prospectively, so it did not invalidate degrees already awarded before its commencement. The students' GAMS degrees therefore remained recognised for higher studies and employment. en-us Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175725 A later permission-based regulatory regime did not retrospectively cancel GAMS degrees lawfully conferred under an earlier recognised framework. The State Faculty's authority under the 1951 Act, together with continued recognition in the Second Schedule to the 1970 Act, meant the GAMS qualification remained valid despite the introduction of the BAMS course and Bihar's indigenous medical regulations. The 1982 Act regulated institutions but did not annul existing degrees. The 2003 amendment introducing prior permission requirements for medical colleges was construed prospectively, so it did not invalidate degrees already awarded before its commencement. The students' GAMS degrees therefore remained recognised for higher studies and employment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175725