https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175722 The Supreme Court affirmed the jurisdiction of the City Civil Court at Ahmedabad in a case involving the formation of a contract for the sale of cotton seed cake. It held that the contract was made at Ahmedabad where the acceptance was communicated, rejecting the defendants' argument that it was concluded at Khamgaon. The Court emphasized the importance of acceptance and intimation in forming a binding contract. A separate judgment by Hidayatullah, J. dissented, asserting that the contract was completed at Khamgaon. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed in line with the majority opinion, upholding the jurisdiction of the City Civil Court at Ahmedabad. en-us Mon, 30 Aug 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Aug 2016 18:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175722 The Supreme Court affirmed the jurisdiction of the City Civil Court at Ahmedabad in a case involving the formation of a contract for the sale of cotton seed cake. It held that the contract was made at Ahmedabad where the acceptance was communicated, rejecting the defendants' argument that it was concluded at Khamgaon. The Court emphasized the importance of acceptance and intimation in forming a binding contract. A separate judgment by Hidayatullah, J. dissented, asserting that the contract was completed at Khamgaon. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed in line with the majority opinion, upholding the jurisdiction of the City Civil Court at Ahmedabad. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Aug 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175722