<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 995 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175715</link>
    <description>Medical admissions to MBBS seats must follow the prescribed merit-based common entrance and counselling regime, and a private college cannot bypass the RPMT-2008 merit list through an independent selection process. Admissions based on a BDS-oriented test or on 10+2 marks were treated as inconsistent with the governing admission framework and therefore illegal, not merely irregular. The institution could not invoke equity after defeating the prescribed counselling process, especially where meritorious waiting-list candidates were deprived of admission without fault. Relief was directed in favour of the RPMT-2008 waiting-list candidates by requiring counselling and consideration for admission on merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2015 15:44:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 995 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175715</link>
      <description>Medical admissions to MBBS seats must follow the prescribed merit-based common entrance and counselling regime, and a private college cannot bypass the RPMT-2008 merit list through an independent selection process. Admissions based on a BDS-oriented test or on 10+2 marks were treated as inconsistent with the governing admission framework and therefore illegal, not merely irregular. The institution could not invoke equity after defeating the prescribed counselling process, especially where meritorious waiting-list candidates were deprived of admission without fault. Relief was directed in favour of the RPMT-2008 waiting-list candidates by requiring counselling and consideration for admission on merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>