<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1161 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175704</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the interim orders by the High Court staying the operation of amended provisions of the U.P. Legal Remembrancer Manual. It emphasized caution in staying statutory provisions unless patently unconstitutional, upheld the reduction of the age of District Government Counsel, and highlighted the importance of consultation with the District Judge for appointment proposals. The Court clarified legal principles on repealing and amending statutory provisions, emphasizing that the High Court erred in directing action under repealed provisions. The appeals were disposed of without costs, with actions under the interim order maintained until final disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1161 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175704</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the interim orders by the High Court staying the operation of amended provisions of the U.P. Legal Remembrancer Manual. It emphasized caution in staying statutory provisions unless patently unconstitutional, upheld the reduction of the age of District Government Counsel, and highlighted the importance of consultation with the District Judge for appointment proposals. The Court clarified legal principles on repealing and amending statutory provisions, emphasizing that the High Court erred in directing action under repealed provisions. The appeals were disposed of without costs, with actions under the interim order maintained until final disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>