<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant accused of misconduct over goods seizure; failed to remit expected foreign exchange amount from exports.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26233</link>
    <description>Confiscation of goods - Revenue’s contention that appellant acted deliberately cannot be ruled out for the reason that an exporter who has not remitted higher amount of foreign exchange to this country does not expect higher quantity of goods with higher value. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2015 11:40:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2015 11:40:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant accused of misconduct over goods seizure; failed to remit expected foreign exchange amount from exports.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26233</link>
      <description>Confiscation of goods - Revenue’s contention that appellant acted deliberately cannot be ruled out for the reason that an exporter who has not remitted higher amount of foreign exchange to this country does not expect higher quantity of goods with higher value. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2015 11:40:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>