<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1392 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175699</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the levy of interest under section 234B of the Act, deeming it mandatory. Regarding the addition to the cost of construction of a hospital building, discrepancies between the assessee&#039;s figures and the DVO&#039;s estimates led to a 25% addition by the Assessing Officer, which was reduced by the CIT(A) but ultimately sustained by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found no basis for further reduction, emphasizing the need for proper valuation due to record deficiencies and the construction&#039;s prolonged duration. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the construction cost addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2015 11:00:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1392 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175699</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the levy of interest under section 234B of the Act, deeming it mandatory. Regarding the addition to the cost of construction of a hospital building, discrepancies between the assessee&#039;s figures and the DVO&#039;s estimates led to a 25% addition by the Assessing Officer, which was reduced by the CIT(A) but ultimately sustained by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found no basis for further reduction, emphasizing the need for proper valuation due to record deficiencies and the construction&#039;s prolonged duration. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the construction cost addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>