<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee&#039;s Claim for Rebate on Arbitrage Loss u/s 88E Denied to Prevent Double Relief.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26230</link>
    <description>Rebate of claim u/s 88E - in case of arbitrage loss assessee had admittedly not paid any income tax. Therefore, if assessee’s plea is accepted then it would lead to double relief to assessee – firstly, by allowing set off u/s 70 against STT income and then allowing rebate from income-tax. This is definitely not the intention of legislature - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:16:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:16:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee&#039;s Claim for Rebate on Arbitrage Loss u/s 88E Denied to Prevent Double Relief.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26230</link>
      <description>Rebate of claim u/s 88E - in case of arbitrage loss assessee had admittedly not paid any income tax. Therefore, if assessee’s plea is accepted then it would lead to double relief to assessee – firstly, by allowing set off u/s 70 against STT income and then allowing rebate from income-tax. This is definitely not the intention of legislature - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:16:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>