<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 181 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268877</link>
    <description>Pending refund applications were required to be decided by the assessing authority through a speaking order after granting an opportunity of hearing, and any amount found payable had to be released in accordance with law. The writ petition was disposed of on that basis, with the focus on timely adjudication of the refund claims and compliance with natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 23:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 181 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268877</link>
      <description>Pending refund applications were required to be decided by the assessing authority through a speaking order after granting an opportunity of hearing, and any amount found payable had to be released in accordance with law. The writ petition was disposed of on that basis, with the focus on timely adjudication of the refund claims and compliance with natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>