<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 171 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268867</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI granted a waiver of pre-deposit for the balance dues to M/s. Silkfab Exports and other applicants, acknowledging partial fulfillment of export obligations and inadequacies in the adjudication order&#039;s consideration of relevant factors. The Tribunal found a prima facie case for waiver of penalties, granting full waiver to one applicant. Specific pre-deposit amounts were directed for each party within a specified timeframe, with the balance of interest and penalties waived, and recovery stayed pending appeal disposal. The judgment addressed issues of alleged diversion of imported goods, denial of customs duty benefits, and imposition of penalties, providing detailed analysis and directives for the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 23:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 171 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268867</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI granted a waiver of pre-deposit for the balance dues to M/s. Silkfab Exports and other applicants, acknowledging partial fulfillment of export obligations and inadequacies in the adjudication order&#039;s consideration of relevant factors. The Tribunal found a prima facie case for waiver of penalties, granting full waiver to one applicant. Specific pre-deposit amounts were directed for each party within a specified timeframe, with the balance of interest and penalties waived, and recovery stayed pending appeal disposal. The judgment addressed issues of alleged diversion of imported goods, denial of customs duty benefits, and imposition of penalties, providing detailed analysis and directives for the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>