<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 69 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1328</link>
    <description>Imported CD-ROMs were treated as computer software for customs exemption because software does not lose that character merely because it needs another program to operate; the notification was applied according to its own terms, and the goods qualified for benefit under Notification No. 11/97-Cus. The declared customs value was also accepted because valuation under Section 14 of the Customs Act must be based on the price of like goods at the time and place of importation; contemporaneous imports prevailed, and suspicion without supporting evidence was insufficient to reject the declared value or allege misdeclaration. As a result, duty demand, confiscation, redemption fine, interest, and penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 06:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 69 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1328</link>
      <description>Imported CD-ROMs were treated as computer software for customs exemption because software does not lose that character merely because it needs another program to operate; the notification was applied according to its own terms, and the goods qualified for benefit under Notification No. 11/97-Cus. The declared customs value was also accepted because valuation under Section 14 of the Customs Act must be based on the price of like goods at the time and place of importation; contemporaneous imports prevailed, and suspicion without supporting evidence was insufficient to reject the declared value or allege misdeclaration. As a result, duty demand, confiscation, redemption fine, interest, and penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>