<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 155 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268851</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, overturning the Order-in-Appeal that dropped the demand for service tax on horizontal drilling for passage of cables. The Tribunal held that the service fell under the taxable category as defined in the Finance Act 1994, regardless of whether machines were used for drilling. It criticized the Commissioner (Appeals) for lacking legal reasoning in setting aside the tax demand for manually conducted drilling. The decision emphasized that the use of machines was not a determining factor for tax liability in this context.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 155 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268851</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, overturning the Order-in-Appeal that dropped the demand for service tax on horizontal drilling for passage of cables. The Tribunal held that the service fell under the taxable category as defined in the Finance Act 1994, regardless of whether machines were used for drilling. It criticized the Commissioner (Appeals) for lacking legal reasoning in setting aside the tax demand for manually conducted drilling. The decision emphasized that the use of machines was not a determining factor for tax liability in this context.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>