<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 140 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268836</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the disallowance under Section 14A, delete the addition of broken period interest, and upheld the decision to allow depreciation on leased assets and the deduction for amortization of premium on HTM securities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 22:21:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 140 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268836</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the disallowance under Section 14A, delete the addition of broken period interest, and upheld the decision to allow depreciation on leased assets and the deduction for amortization of premium on HTM securities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>