<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 136 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268832</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) decision to delete the trading addition, emphasizing the lack of material defects in the books of account and valid reasons for the GP rate decline. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed based on past decisions and the assessee&#039;s explanations for the GP rate differences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 22:21:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 136 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268832</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) decision to delete the trading addition, emphasizing the lack of material defects in the books of account and valid reasons for the GP rate decline. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed based on past decisions and the assessee&#039;s explanations for the GP rate differences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>