<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 132 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268828</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of taxing Capital Gains in the year of the development agreement, granting exemption under Section 54F for reinvestment in houses, and directing independent assessment of Long Term Capital Gains for the development of plots. The ITAT disagreed with the CIT(A) on various issues, providing detailed reasoning and instructions for each matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 22:20:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 132 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268828</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of taxing Capital Gains in the year of the development agreement, granting exemption under Section 54F for reinvestment in houses, and directing independent assessment of Long Term Capital Gains for the development of plots. The ITAT disagreed with the CIT(A) on various issues, providing detailed reasoning and instructions for each matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>