<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 82 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside confiscation orders, duty demands, and penalties imposed on various individuals and entities under the Customs Act. It found that statutory records certified by the Bond Officer were credible, refuting allegations of illegal activities such as diversion of scrap and undervaluation. The Tribunal concluded that the evidence did not substantiate the claims, leading to the allowance of appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 82 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside confiscation orders, duty demands, and penalties imposed on various individuals and entities under the Customs Act. It found that statutory records certified by the Bond Officer were credible, refuting allegations of illegal activities such as diversion of scrap and undervaluation. The Tribunal concluded that the evidence did not substantiate the claims, leading to the allowance of appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>