https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268827 The appellate tribunal remitted the issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration due to discrepancies in the valuation adopted by the assessee and the AO. The tribunal stressed the importance of providing the assessee with adequate opportunities to be heard and considered in the valuation process. The CIT(Appeals) upheld the stamp valuation authority's value for computing capital gains, with the appellate tribunal supporting this decision and allowing the appeal for statistical purposes. en-us Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268827 The appellate tribunal remitted the issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration due to discrepancies in the valuation adopted by the assessee and the AO. The tribunal stressed the importance of providing the assessee with adequate opportunities to be heard and considered in the valuation process. The CIT(Appeals) upheld the stamp valuation authority's value for computing capital gains, with the appellate tribunal supporting this decision and allowing the appeal for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268827