<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 126 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of set-off of unabsorbed depreciation for the 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal held that the unabsorbed depreciation related to the EOU could be set off against profits for the assessment year, contrary to the lower authorities&#039; decisions. Additionally, the matter of condonation of delay in filing the appeal was remanded back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 22:20:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 126 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of set-off of unabsorbed depreciation for the 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal held that the unabsorbed depreciation related to the EOU could be set off against profits for the assessment year, contrary to the lower authorities&#039; decisions. Additionally, the matter of condonation of delay in filing the appeal was remanded back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>