<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (2) TMI 80 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175683</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the interest paid on borrowings by the assessee could not be deducted from dividend income under Section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized that the interest was incurred for the business of trading in shares and securities, not solely for earning dividend income. Therefore, the deduction was disallowed, and the assessee was directed to pay the costs of the Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 15:55:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (2) TMI 80 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175683</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the interest paid on borrowings by the assessee could not be deducted from dividend income under Section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized that the interest was incurred for the business of trading in shares and securities, not solely for earning dividend income. Therefore, the deduction was disallowed, and the assessee was directed to pay the costs of the Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>