<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1057 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175680</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, relying on its earlier ruling for F.Y. 2003-04, which determined that the provisions of section 194 H did not apply to the transaction between the assessee and concessionaires. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was upheld based on the Tribunal&#039;s previous decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 15:44:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1057 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175680</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, relying on its earlier ruling for F.Y. 2003-04, which determined that the provisions of section 194 H did not apply to the transaction between the assessee and concessionaires. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was upheld based on the Tribunal&#039;s previous decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>