https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175675 A petitioner under Article 226 must show a subsisting personal right and its infringement; here, quasi-permanent allottees of evacuee property retained a legally protectable interest, later enlarged by a sanad into an absolute property right, so locus standi was established. The consolidation statute required equality of value in substituted holdings or compensation for lesser-value allotments, and State Government instructions could not override that statutory duty. Directions authorising allotment of inferior land without compensation were inconsistent with the Act, so the consolidation scheme was invalid and the High Court's setting aside of it was upheld. en-us Thu, 04 May 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Dec 2015 13:56:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175675 A petitioner under Article 226 must show a subsisting personal right and its infringement; here, quasi-permanent allottees of evacuee property retained a legally protectable interest, later enlarged by a sanad into an absolute property right, so locus standi was established. The consolidation statute required equality of value in substituted holdings or compensation for lesser-value allotments, and State Government instructions could not override that statutory duty. Directions authorising allotment of inferior land without compensation were inconsistent with the Act, so the consolidation scheme was invalid and the High Court's setting aside of it was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 May 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175675