<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (5) TMI 62 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175675</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the respondents&#039; right to challenge the consolidation scheme under Art. 226 of the Constitution due to their valuable interest in the allotted property. The Court declared the scheme formulated by the Consolidation Officer, based on improper instructions from the State Government, as illegal. Consequently, the High Court&#039;s decision to set aside the scheme was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 13:56:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=407316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (5) TMI 62 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175675</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the respondents&#039; right to challenge the consolidation scheme under Art. 226 of the Constitution due to their valuable interest in the allotted property. The Court declared the scheme formulated by the Consolidation Officer, based on improper instructions from the State Government, as illegal. Consequently, the High Court&#039;s decision to set aside the scheme was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>