https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175674 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to dismiss writ petitions filed by appellants seeking mandamus for appointment as Additional District and Sessions Judges. The Court affirmed the Governor's discretion in accepting recommendations for District Judge appointments and emphasized the necessity of a legally enforceable right for mandamus relief. It clarified the High Court's role in recommending candidates, stating that the Governor is not obligated to accept these recommendations without justification. The High Court's criticized actions in supporting specific candidates were noted, and the appellants' lack of locus standi was a key factor in the dismissal of the appeals. en-us Thu, 09 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Dec 2015 13:51:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175674 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to dismiss writ petitions filed by appellants seeking mandamus for appointment as Additional District and Sessions Judges. The Court affirmed the Governor's discretion in accepting recommendations for District Judge appointments and emphasized the necessity of a legally enforceable right for mandamus relief. It clarified the High Court's role in recommending candidates, stating that the Governor is not obligated to accept these recommendations without justification. The High Court's criticized actions in supporting specific candidates were noted, and the appellants' lack of locus standi was a key factor in the dismissal of the appeals. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175674