https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175672 The court granted the petitioner anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged excise duty evasion under Section 9 of the Central Excise Act 1944. Despite opposition from the enforcement agency citing seriousness of the offense, the court considered the petitioner's lack of involvement during the relevant period and completed investigation due to co-accused detention. The court found jail detention unnecessary, given the petitioner's resignation before the evasion period, and imposed a condition of executing a personal bond and cooperating with investigations when required. en-us Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jan 2016 18:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175672 The court granted the petitioner anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged excise duty evasion under Section 9 of the Central Excise Act 1944. Despite opposition from the enforcement agency citing seriousness of the offense, the court considered the petitioner's lack of involvement during the relevant period and completed investigation due to co-accused detention. The court found jail detention unnecessary, given the petitioner's resignation before the evasion period, and imposed a condition of executing a personal bond and cooperating with investigations when required. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175672